Date : Wed, 09 Jul 2003 11:59:58 +0000

David Triesman,

Hi!

I wonder what the status is with George Galloway's suspension from the "Labour" Party?

It's surreal beyond belief that he's been suspended for "bringing the Party into disrepute", when it's currently led by a mass-murdering War-Criminal, with lips that pour forth lies and deceptions every time they open. From what I can tell, beginning with KosovO, and never ending since.

In fact the only time you can be sure when either Blair or Bush is telling the truth is when they make diametrically opposite statements on a single logical issue. The problem then is to decide which one it it is. Most of the time, my money would be on Bush, and that's saying something.

On top of all that, Blair is the ultimate buggerer of little boys.

Not meant to mean, as the link above illustrates, in the wayward Roman Catholic priest sense, but in an even worse one.

That little boy certainly looks buggered to me. He would really have been better off "cloistered" in some Roman Catholic seminary with some dodgy priests.

Photos courtesy of the Brits. for Peace web-site, whose "liberate" photo' page reveals Blair to be also an indiscriminate (co-)buggerer of men, women, and little girls. Lots of 'photos of buggered people there. I'm sure you would agree with me that they look extremely buggered.

So, Blair's definitely one up on wayward Catholic priests. His way to Heaven is assured.

Guess who's really bringing the Party into disrepute.

I know that Blair, Straw, et alia have no shame.

Have you no shame, either?

A former "Labour" Party Member,

Sincerely,
Dennis Revell.

P.S: Wonder if you'd consider posting my home page on "Labour" Party web-sites? Here it is:

http://dennisrevell.home.att.net/Politico/TITLE_ONLY_Open_letter_to_Prime_Minister_Tony_BlairTXT.htm

On second thoughts, perhaps you wouldn't. Still, Brits. for Peace, and others, were good enough to use some of the stuff.

Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:41:08 +0100

I wouldn't normally reply and I won't do so again. But I must say that on
reading your email and the extraordinary choice of deplorable sexual
refernces I wonder whether you have considered getting professional help.
Either you have standards that suggest you have a good deal of
self-contempt or you really do need serious psychiatric help.

Wed, 09 Jul 2003 19:00:33 +0000

Yea, forgive me, Mr Triesman,

The use of "deplorable sexual references" on my part, as you term them, is so much worse than burning alive, and maiming and killing little boys, little girls, women and men, and generally turning human beings into butcher's meat; all based on an astonishing stream of lies that Tone continues to repeat to this day.

What was I thinking to get my priorities so out of kilter. Silly me.

... Still, on the other hand, it did elicit a darn pretty quick reply from you. Ever so polite letters to Tone, and a somewhat less polite one to Jack "The Ripper" Straw, got nary a peep.

Don't you think Tony & Jack et alia have slightly worse psychological problems than mine? I'm sure there must be a medical term for whatever it is they've got: flagrant lying, a propensity to fake pretexts for "war" (slaughter, really, wars are usually a bit more evenly matched), and total disregard for human life. Don't you think? God Syndrome, may be? Nah, doesn't sound right.

Speaking of which, don't you think Tony especially is in need of psychiatric help? That Steve Bell cartoonist fellow at the Guardian obviously thinks so, among others. Moreover, Tone stated a while ago that he would only have to answer to God for his actions? Doesn't he know that's eerily similar to what Adolph Hitler said, and moreover, doesn't he know there's a helluva queue? There are quite a lot of people on this side of the hereafter demanding somewhat earlier answers, preferably culminating in incarceration at the Hague, irrespective of the recent largely white-washed considerations of the Foreign Affairs Committee. May be you'd better hope that Tone does some have diagnosable psychiatric condition - that'd be his only defence.

Well, you appear yourself to have some balance left. You at least haven't stated that anyone highly critical of the current bunch of war-criminals currently running the country as, by definition, in need of psychiatric help. As far as my "standards" are concerned, hey, I'm neither a wayward Catholic Priest, nor a War-Criminal. So whatever they are, I believe they're higher than either of those. So that includes your bosses.

Speaking of "unpleasant sexual references" there are those nutty conspiracy theory web-sites that allege all kind of things. I don't put much store on them myself, but I sometimes stumble on the odd one that gives me a chuckle:

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/blair_protection.html

Nothing to it, I expect.

Guess there's no chance you'll link to my "letters" home-page then?

I re-iterate my question, in spite of the fact that you indicate that you probably would not reply again. Have you no shame? I'll be clearer, have you no shame working and being an apologist for these people?

Regards,

Sincerely,
Dennis Revell.
dennisfax@hotmail.com

P.S: You make a reference to self-contempt. I think I've made it pretty clear where my contempt lies. Same place your's should.